From my doctoral course
This note comes from the doctoral course “Multi-Criteria Decision Making”. I rewrote the explanations in my own words and recomputed the numerical examples. Main source of the course: Asgharpour, Multi-Criteria Decision Making (University of Tehran).
Why normalise?
Price is in millions, battery in hours and beauty a score from 1 to 5. These cannot be added or multiplied directly. Normalisation turns each column into a unitless number, usually between 0 and 1. Non-compensatory methods usually do not need it, since each attribute is measured separately.
Example: one attribute, four alternatives
Values: .
| Method | Formula | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Linear (positive attribute) | 0.56, 0.78, 0.44, 1.00 | |
| Linear (negative attribute) | 0.80, 0.57, 1.00, 0.44 | |
| Euclidean norm | 0.38, 0.54, 0.31, 0.69 (norm ≈ 130.8) | |
| Ratio (sum) | 0.20, 0.28, 0.16, 0.36 | |
| Min-max (positive) | 0.20, 0.60, 0.00, 1.00 | |
| Min-max (negative) | 0.80, 0.40, 1.00, 0.00 | |
| Normal distribution | −0.65, 0.39, −1.17, 1.43 |
Character of each method
- Linear: the best value is always 1 but the worst is not zero. For a negative attribute there are two ways: the inverse (above) or , used when all attributes are negative.
- Norm: all values stay between 0 and 1 and the direction of the attribute (positive or negative) does not change; it is the basis of TOPSIS.
- Ratio: the column sum is always 1; for a negative attribute, take the ratio of the inverses.
- Min-max: best is 1 and worst is 0; it uses the full range but is very sensitive to outliers.
- Normal distribution: with many alternatives we can assume a normal distribution; values lie around zero, usually between −3.5 and +3.5.
- Centre-seeking: when the “most desirable” value is neither the maximum nor the minimum but a midpoint (for example the right level of risk-taking for a job). Each alternative is measured by its distance from that desirable point.
A warning
The choice of normalisation method can change the final ranking. I think a good analysis runs with at least two methods and, if the rankings differ, investigates why.
Related: Introduction: what is multi-attribute decision making? and Weighting criteria.